Camp Lejeune Lawsuit News and Updates

Mainly intended for personal use, the judge concluded that the legislation applied to a female individual utilizing her mobile device. In an effort to attract prospective customers, the legal action originated from unwanted phone calls made by attorneys from Camp Lejeune. In relation to the rejection of a lawsuit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, a federal judge in West Virginia denied a motion by a law firm to challenge his ruling earlier this week.

According to the TCPA, the judge made reference to Federal Communications Commission regulations, highlighting that ‘wireless telephone numbers’ are indeed considered ‘residential telephone subscribers.’ Despite differing interpretations in other courts, businesses would be prohibited from soliciting calls to her number if confirmed. The woman’s claim that her cellphone was equivalent to a “residential telephone subscriber” under the TCPA formed the basis of the law firm’s appeal. The judge stated that it was premature to appeal his decision, which upheld that the telemarketing calls to the woman were valid under the TCPA, particularly since she had registered her number on the national do-not-call registry.

There is no doubt that there was frustration regarding the advertising for customers for these assertions.

September 7, 2023 – Further Considerations on the Settlement Proposal

As we said yesterday, our lawyers think few will jump on this settlement offer. Why? The settlement payouts are just too low.

The proposal may take into account instances with restricted vulnerability at Lejeune and other elements of risk for the illness that would render the case challenging to establish during legal proceedings. Indeed, there are certain assertions where this agreement appears logical.

Your case might be better under this rough kind of justice settlement if, for example, you were at Camp Lejeune for only 30 days and were later diagnosed with bladder cancer, which was a substantial contributing cause of your cancer, and you smoked three packs of cigarettes a day.

How many cases of contaminated water will resemble this scenario? It is unlikely that there will be a sufficient number of such cases to enable the government to achieve its objective of significantly diminishing the number of claims.

These figures of settlement fail to achieve that objective as the Department of Justice ought to enhance the offer to render the decision more intricate for a larger number of victims.

  • If you have a comment or a question, ask below, and we will try to reply to you as quickly as possible.
  • Further considerations regarding the settlement offer for Camp Lejeune.
  • September 6, 2023 – Resolutions for Camp Lejeune Cases

    The government has introduced a settlement program offering individuals, including veterans of Camp Lejeune, who claim they were harmed by contaminated water at Marine Corps Base Carolina North, up to $450,000 in compensation.

    This settlement offer from Camp Lejeune may be an attractive option depending on the claims of a minority, but it is not a good one.

    It will function, to a certain degree. Therefore, they offer a prompt resolution to decrease the figures. The authorities must decrease the overall quantity of demands to a more feasible level. So what is this regarding?

    This initiative aims to resolve potentially hundreds of thousands of claims more swiftly, as some veterans affected have expressed frustration with the slow process of claims. If you are willing to take what may be much less worth in your case, the speed at which your money gets processed will likely be faster.

    Eligible claimants under the plan will receive compensation based on their specific ailments and the length of their time at the base, encompassing a range of conditions such as cancer, renal disease, and Parkinson’s.

    $300,000 would be awarded to an individual who resided at Lejeune for a period ranging from one to five years. Similarly, $150,000 would be granted to someone who spent less than a year there and subsequently experienced kidney cancer. It is worth noting that very few individuals stayed at the base for more than five years in practice. As an illustration, a veteran who served at the base for over five years and developed kidney cancer could potentially receive $450,000.

    For that intermediate level (1-5 years), the amount would be $250,000, the maximum limit is set at $100,000, and the highest amount decreases to $400,000 for a Tier 2 scenario.

    Claims for unlawful death would be granted an extra $100,000.

    These are the levels qualified for this harmful water agreement:.