Attorney for Man Accused of Killing 5 Neighbors in Texas Suggests Not All Has Been Revealed About Shooting

Proposed on Thursday that lawyers for the individual charged with murdering five of his neighbors after forcefully entering their Texas residence not everything has been disclosed regarding the events that preceded the fatal gunfire and that the defendant was an individual who was charitable and well-regarded.

Francisco Oropeza, 38, appeared in court for the first time on Thursday after being apprehended on May 2 following a four-day search.

He is facing murder charges for the shooting deaths of five people, including a 9-year-old boy, in Honduras. Authorities allege that Oropeza responded by charging into their home and firing his rifle, killing all five victims. Neighbors asked him to stop firing because a baby was trying to sleep. The incident took place in a rural neighborhood in Cleveland, located 72 km (45 miles) northeast of Houston, on April 28th.

Oropeza, a Mexican national who has been deported four times between 2016 and 2009, was led into a courthouse in Coldspring, Texas, approximately 97 km north of Houston. During the procedural court hearing, he did not speak and also did not say anything to reporters as he was dressed in a faded white and pink striped prison uniform.

Attorneys said that it is still too early to know what happened after his hearing. There had been some tension between his neighbors and Oropeza, and it’s still too early to know what happened on the night of the killings.

Anthony Osso, one of Oropeza’s lawyers, stated, “the initial narrative regarding requesting him to refrain from firing his firearm in the backyard due to a sleeping infant is unlikely to be substantiated as an accurate rendition of the incidents.”

Osso stated that while the mass shootings have been presented as a different type of situation, it will end up being upended.

Garcia’s son, newborn at the time, was unable to sleep because Oropeza respectfully asked if he could shoot from a farther distance away from their home. Garcia had previously informed other reporters that the two people who were killed were his 9-year-old son and wife, Wilson.

After attending a vigil at his son’s school on April 30th, Garcia expressed, “He informed us that he was within his premises and possessed the freedom to act as he pleased.”

His attorneys stated that Oropeza, a skilled worker, would assist any individual in the vicinity who required any electrical or plumbing services. Osso mentioned that Oropeza and his fellow residents had maintained a friendly relationship.

According to Osso, the dogs belonging to the neighbors were responsible for the death of Oropeza’s family’s sheep and chickens, and they also trespassed into Oropeza’s yard, leading to a deterioration in the relationship between Oropeza and his neighbors.

“Lisa Andrews, another one of Oropeza’s attorneys, stated that the picture presented was significantly dissimilar from the initial witness statement, which ultimately preceded the shooting.”

Andrews and Osso both chose not to provide any comments regarding the night of the shooting or any information that Oropeza might have shared with them about it.

Oropeza mentioned that cutting down a tree had previously assisted him. He mentioned that he occasionally conversed with their spouses and never encountered any difficulties with Garcia.

Rob Freyer, the first assistant district attorney with the San Jacinto County attorney’s office, declined to comment on all the claims made by Oropeza’s attorneys that have been revealed in the shooting case.

“It was a slaughter. The entire globe is aware of that … It was a calamity,” Freyer stated.

Andrews said that she expects the murder charges against Oropeza to be upgraded to capital murder, which would make him eligible for the death penalty.

San Jacinto County District Attorney Todd Dillon said Oropeza’s case will likely not be presented to a grand jury until next month.

Oropeza’s next court appearance is scheduled for Aug. 10. The wife and a friend of Oropeza have both been accused of obstructing justice in the arrest or trial of a convicted criminal.