Do You Think Chess Is A Sport?

Before debating whether chess should be classified as a sport or an athletic activity, let’s first eliminate any unnecessary formalities.

“Music, poetry, and knowledge of runes (Bryhn, 2018)” originally encompassed all forms or manifestations of highly esteemed talents, along with physical accomplishments, that govern the contemporary comprehension of “athletics” (“idrett”, derived from old Norse, “id”, denoting work or activity, and “drott”, signifying power, strength, or perseverance (Bryhn, 2021; Falk & Torp, 1991, p. 326)” as stated by Loland (as cited in Skjervum, 2009), Bryhn (2021), and Falk and Torp (1991, pp. 325-326).

The distinction between productive or expedient concepts is often raised when discussing athletics and other leisure activities such as racing motor and equestrianism. Today, these concepts are used interchangeably without a universal agreement or definition on what separates athletics from other sports. While athletics emphasizes the control of the body and the efforts of athletes, it is also appreciated as a basic condition of animal or transport means, devices, tools, equipment, and facilities. Humans find anything entertaining or amusing that falls under the meaning of “sport”, including football, handball, tennis, boxing, skating, skiing, and more.

In the realm of physical sensations, if we are truly questioning what chess players are doing, it can be perceived as both an athletic activity and a sport. We may also consider life to be a game, with its own set of rules and recipes. However, calling it a game is a self-explanatory and unworthy tautology, as the rule is based on the claim that chess is just a game. These activities are ruled by the fact that they are based on game-like actions, but claiming that they belong exclusively to the realm of “play” or “only” game is an inadequate definition. We might say that all sports, including athletic or sports activities, belong under the definition provided by Wikipedia. Let’s start with that.

It is contradictory to say that chess is not a sport, considering that the former president of the Norwegian Athletic Federation (NIF) Rognlien (as mentioned in Vesteng, 2012) and Fossum (2013), former vice president of the Norwegian Chess Federation (NSF), assert that chess is not considered a sport because NSF is not affiliated with the NIF. The fact that NSF is not a member of the NIF simply demonstrates that NSF is not associated with the NIF.

Few doubt how, where, and what mental warriors perform. We may ask if the achievement or performance of a finer perception excludes the emphasis on the physical, as it cannot be measured or quantified in an obsessed country that values only countable and quantifiable things. It seems that the contemporary understanding of athletic or sporting performance still saturates the physical aspect, despite the fact that it may involve activities and games such as shooting, darts, archery, bridge, chess, and others. This is something that newspapers’ commentary fields agree on.

Is the “motion” or athletic performance and achievement based solely on criteria? As quoted by Ingebrigtsen, the 1500-meter runner, and Norwegian athletics coach and TV commentator Kaggestad, it is said to be a result of hard work and determination.

It may be argued that the prevalent preference for the physical is deeply rooted in Cartesian dualism, representing two ontologically separate categories that are impossible to combine into a higher unity. (This argument can be seen in a painting by Frans Hals, above, depicting René Descartes after 1596-1650, where Cartesian dualism is deeply rooted in the prevalent preference for the physical.)

Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961) proposed in his book Phenomenology of Perception (1945/2012) that our understanding, encounter, and existence in the world are primarily through our physical form. Consciousness (cogito) was previously regarded as the main origin of knowledge and experience, while the body was seen as a subordinate addition.

Religion and philosophy emphasize the mind, rather than the body, as Ponty-Merleau reminds us that the brain is a part of the body and both are interconnected and homogeneous, forming a unified whole.

Rognlien and Ingebrigtsen, as if limbs move independently, take it to the other extreme and emphasize the physical aspect at the cost of intellect, similar to how religion and philosophy disregard the bodily importance in understanding and familiarity.

The definition of sports or athletics is dependent on the physical movement of the body, specifically the legs and arms. This external bodily motion is clear and evident, unlike the internal cerebral motion. To understand and comprehend something, the brain needs to receive perception or information, which takes approximately 750 to 550 milliseconds (between 100-0.5 m/s). In 1998, Tovée stated that the speed at which thoughts are processed and comprehended by the brain falls within this range. Additionally, it is now known that any physical motion starts with electric impulses.

In 1999, Nørretranders published a book called “The User Illusion,” which explores the connection between thought and physical activity. According to Nørretranders, thinking does not require any additional calories or physical exertion, as it is a purely mental process. However, he argues that thought can still be considered a form of physical activity, as it is reminiscent of corporeal activities like playing tennis. Nørretranders suggests that thought is a tangible and objective activity, similar to furnishing a room. Therefore, studying the brain’s metabolism and energy consumption can provide clear connections between physiological and mental activity.

We have compared oranges to apples! Chess moves and strokes have the same source. Both actions spring from subconsciously triggered impulses in the brain; Petter Northug, a Norwegian cross-country skier, strokes himself forward and lifts his poles, while Magnus kniggeth sacks and lifts his arm. There is no principal difference between these words, among others.

We observe neurons and synapses, not legs and arms. Before the chess tournament, we stem from time to time and see what is really going on, but we cannot conclude that the definitions of athletics and sports are based on that.

Does athletics not begin until a few seconds after the high jump? In comparison to skiing and cross-country skiers, athletes in athletics perform less and have longer strides, while skiers have shorter strides and tears, sweat, and “blood” are most prevalent in the greatest athletes. However, the physical aspect of athletics, which includes understanding modern proficiency, skills, and technique, is weighed heavier. On the other hand, classical concept of athletics (idrett) suffers from inherent tension between physical performance and proficiency in other aspects.

If we do not define and grade performance in a contextually appropriate manner, where do we draw the line? If you die while exerting yourself physically or while playing in the field, what does that say about those who make the biggest effort for the best results? What about those who make less effort but achieve better results? Is proficiency solely based on physical effort, or does it also involve technical skills?

Do we define and grade performance based on physical exertion during activities such as playing sports? What about the difference in strides and strokes between skiing or athletics? Are cross-country skiers performing shorter strides and strokes compared to those in other sports? Who are the athletes that put in the most effort, with tears, sweat, and blood? Our daily condition does not depend on the definitions and days of the past, so it seems that physical or corporeal performance in athletics is not irrelevant.

In present times, however, music, poetry, and ancient inscriptions were highly valued. Should sports (idrett) be given the same level of appreciation and consideration? And what exactly determines Magnus’ most recent achievement? The most reliable approach is the rating system, as it is impossible to measure or quantify one’s chess abilities and knowledge. Can physical or bodily performances or skills be accurately defined or graded?

Professionals in chess work on their ability to visualize sequences, such as variations, in order to improve their positional understanding and intuition. They also focus on developing their reflexes, specifically tactics in endgames, middlegames, and openings, by practicing different types of positions. Both physically and mentally, they dedicate around 7-8 hours a day to their chess work. It should be noted that chess players are not only engaged in tournaments and exams, but also in studying and playing chess professionally.

Today’s game will test their mental resilience as they struggle with poor sleep and headaches. It is crucial that they do not underestimate their lower-rated opponent and remain focused even if they face stronger opposition. They should maintain composure both in defense and attack, being cautious of the other team’s malicious intentions. It is important for them to be on high alert and aware of potential dangers. Will their performance in this game determine the outcome of the tournament and their next round opponent? I am concerned about their preparations and how it may affect their performance during the game.

In the 1984-85 World Championship match, known as “Karpov vs Kasparov,” the older Karpov replaced the younger Kasparov. It is widely acknowledged that Karpov experienced a significant weight loss of 10 kilograms during this period, which can be attributed to the immense mental strain and physical exertion he underwent.

Engaging in the game of chess, utilizing the physical body, is influenced by a physical factor (Kim, 1993, p. 280; Vicente, 2006, p. 150) which asserts that every physical outcome or occurrence, following the principle of the physical domain’s causal closure, necessitates that effects and causes be of the same nature – physical effects necessitate physical causes. It is challenging, when considering the definition of sports or athletics, to argue why traditional physical exertion should carry more significance than fatigue resulting from intense concentration over time (both in research and in tournament play). The physical fatigue experienced by chess players is dependent on neural collaboration during strain, which consequently contributes to it. This is comparable to how our experience of headaches relies on material prerequisites.

The physicalism worldview is concerned with how the physical and mental properties are related, specifically in terms of the metaphysical relationship between the physical and mental properties. In our case, if our knowledge is represented in the brain and actions such as moving legs and arms cause physical effects, then consciousness, which is non-physical, cannot initiate actions. This is because physical actions require physical causes and effects. Therefore, in a physical universe, where only physical properties exist, states or properties that are non-physical, such as knowledge and behavior, do not have a place.

If not specifically related to sports, the element of competition turns any activity into a sport, and Kaggestad emphasizes that competition is crucial in determining whether something can be considered a sport, we could argue.

We can dabble well in anything without making it into something very faintest without having any idea of what we’re doing. If we’re not competing in athletics where the concept of sport is embedded, it doesn’t seem like proficiency or skills are relevant. To find something to disperse ourselves, we must emphasize the competitive aspect more when we’re not doing sports. At the same time, the leisure activities challenge appears to be the aspect of leisure that was previously perceived as professionalization, if we consider what we did earlier for leisure.

According to Wikipedia, chess may be considered a sport and an athletic activity due to the physical exertion and the use of equipment or tools, such as blindfold covers, during tournaments. In this context, players score 0 points for a loss, ½ for a draw, and 1 for a win.

The competitive aspect of chess is more significant because it involves scoring points, according to Gadamer (1900-2002). While the use of equipment, tools, or devices is not necessary, it is possible. Engaging in athletics without competition or scoring points can be seen as exercising, but we do not refer to it as “becoming athletics”. The concept of sports precisely links the competitive aspect to the idea of “becoming a sport”.

Georg Hans Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, as formulated in his magnum opus Truth and Method (2013, pp. 106-178), explores how our prejudices, expectations, and presuppositions influence our interpretation and understanding of works of art, such as paintings or texts. This encounter with art can challenge our interpretative framework, even if the artwork is simply hanging on a wall. It is like a game of chess, where both players have something at stake and claim that chess is a sport. Gadamer’s point is complex, but it congratulates or annoys you, making you think about the text or painting that you have encountered.

In the competitive aspect of chess, if we limit ourselves to the requirement that NIF or high jump doesn’t fulfill, players are supposed to compete in the way that reflects their proficiency on the rating lists. We risk an open and boundless concept of athletics or idrett, where anything can “become a sport” because it requires a minimum knowledge and competence in any activity that has a physical effect, no matter how small the exertion. The classical concept of athletics or idrett is embedded in the principle that standardization of performance and physical requirements is impossible, due to the variety of activities that may have a perceptive reader.

The debate over whether chess can be considered as a sport or not is seen to attract commercial attention and sponsorship. While chess does not involve physical athleticism or winning and losing, it is still recognized as a noble art that requires qualities such as perseverance, analytical ability, and team spirit. Athletes are often considered desirable role models, and sports and athletics are seen as a way to develop these qualities. However, it is important to analyze and plan for the development of these attributes in chess, just as in any other sport or athletic activity.

Conclusion:.

Competency and abilities, also known as “know-how,” encompass the physical execution and engagement in tournament chess. This is not due to the fact that playing chess improves our physical fitness, but rather because it does not require physical exertion or specialized equipment. Chess can be considered a sport as players find amusement and entertainment in it, aligning with the definition of a sport. It appears to challenge our comprehension and perspective of activities as either sports or athletics, as the world primarily revolves around physicality and the establishment of standardized physical performance as a prerequisite for something to be classified as a sport or athletics seems unattainable.

The recent discoveries in the broader and wider context suggest that there is a conceptual distinction between “idrett” athletics and sport that is less meaningful and/or clear than previously assumed.

Bibliography:.

Bryhn, R. (2021, 19 January). Athletics [Sports]. In Store norske leksikon. Retrieved 4 April 2021 from https://snl.No/idrett.

Measuring the velocity of cognitive processes, (1998, 28 May). SCIENCEAGOGO. Http://www.Scienceagogo.Com/news/19980428032910data_trunc_sys.Shtml.

Antikvariat Ringstrøms Bjørn. Etymological Dictionary of Danish and Norwegian. (1991) A. Torp & Falk.

Fossum, W. (2013, April 6). -Chess is not a sport. Aftenposten. Http://www.Aftenposten.No/meninger/debatt/i/5VxAm/-sjakk-er-ikke-idrett.

Gadamer, H.G. (2013). Truth and method. Bloomsbury Academic.

The thesis-graduate Post (minimal physicalism in the mental status The–autonomy and emergentism) by Ø.S. Galaaen (2001) explores the minimal physicalism in the mental status and its connection to autonomy and emergentism.

According to VG (2013, 21 December), Kaggestad believes that chess is a sport to the highest degree.

Karpov vs Kasparov, 1984-85: The interrupted game. (N.D.). Chessgames.Com. Http://www.Chessgames.Com/perl/chess.Pl?Tid=55015.

Kim, J. (1993). Supervenience and consciousness: Selected philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). The Experience of Perception. [D. A. Landes, Translator]. Routledge. (Original work published 1945).

Nørretranders, T. (1999), The user illusion: Reducing consciousness to a smaller scale (J. Sydenham, Trans.). Penguin Books.

Skjervum, E (2009, 9 October), Is chess considered a sport? [Is Chess Sport?]. Dagbladet. Http://www.Dagbladet.No/2009/10/09/sport/sjakk/magnus_carlsen/lars_monsen/johan_kaggestad/8502980/.

Athletics. (N.D.-A). In Wikipedia. Retrieved 5 July, 2018, from http://en.Wikipedia.Org/wiki/Athletics.

Sport. (N.D.-B). In Wikipedia. Retrieved 5 July, 2018, from http://no.Wikipedia.Org/wiki/Sport.

Staughton, J. (11 November 2021). The human mind vs. Supercomputers… Which one emerges victorious? Science ABC. Retrieved 12 November 2021 https://www.Scienceabc.Com/humans/the-human-brain-vs-supercomputers-which-one-wins.Html.

Tovée, M. J. (1994). What is the rate of thinking? Current Biology, 4(12), 1125-1127. Http://www.Science.Smith.Edu/departments/neurosci/courses/bio330/pdf/94CurrBiolTovee.Pdf.

VG. The President of the Norwegian Athletic Association (NIF) stated that Carlsen is not considered an athlete.

Vicente, A. (2006). On the comprehensive causality of physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20(2), 149-171. Https://doi.Org/10.1080/02698590600814332.

Chess players and “athletes” are mutually exclusive in the impression they give under the appearance (para. 13, 2012, Vesteng in cited as Rognlien).

We would like to extend our gratitude and appreciation to Mr. Frederic Friedel at Chessbase.Com for generously providing us with exceptional visuals to complement the article.