The CSS style code “float:right; border:1px solid #FFB81F; background-color: white; width: 250px; font-size: .9em; margin-bottom:0px;” defines the visual attributes of an element with a width of 250 pixels, a white background color, a solid border with a color of #FFB81F, and a font size of .9em. This particular style code is frequently employed to generate a compact container with precise measurements and design.
Both clear: {clearfix.} Auto; margin: block; display: px; 150 width: {img-widget.} Inline-block; display: right; float: 57%; width: {value-widget.} Bold; font-weight: top; vertical-align: 10px; padding-left: inline-block; display: {key-widget.} Bold; font-weight: top; vertical-align: 10px; padding-left: inline-block; display: 43% width: {key-widget.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: green; background-color: {Green.} Bold; font-weight: black; color: #f9d334; background-color: {Libertarian.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: grey; background-color: {Constitution Nonpartisan.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: grey; background-color: {Independent Republican {background-color: {Democratic.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: red; background-color: {Republican.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: #003388; background-color: {Democratic.} Black; color: f9f9f9; background-color: {white.} Bold; font-weight: grey; color: f9f9f9; background-color: {white.} Bold; font-weight: grey; color: center; text-only value-row.Widget {bold; font-weight: white; color: background-color: grey; center; text-align: value-only.Widget-row {em; 1.2 size: font-heading.Widget-row {px; 1px; margin-bottom: margin-top: 100%; width: inline-block; display: row.Widget {px; 1px; margin-bottom: margin-top: 100%; width: inline-block; display: row.Widget { } 0; bottom: margin: p {infobox.} . Output: Both clear: {clearfix.} Automatic; margin: block; display: pixels; 150 width: {img-widget.} Inline-block; display: right; float: 57%; width: {value-widget.} Bold; font-weight: top; vertical-align: 10 pixels; padding-left: inline-block; display: {key-widget.} Bold; font-weight: top; vertical-align: 10 pixels; padding-left: inline-block; display: 43% width: {key-widget.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: green; background-color: {Green.} Bold; font-weight: black; color: #f9d334; background-color: {Libertarian.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: grey; background-color: {Constitution Nonpartisan.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: grey; background-color: {Independent Republican {background-color: {Democratic.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: red; background-color: {Republican.} Bold; font-weight: white; color: #003388; background-color: {Democratic.} Black; color: f9f9f9;
Mark Mullet is a member of the Democratic Party representing District 5 in the Washington State Senate. He assumed office on January 14, 2013. His current term ends on January 13, 2025.
Mullet (Democratic Party) is running for election for Governor of Washington. He declared candidacy for the primary scheduled on August 6, 2024.
Mullet worked as deputy leader of the minority caucus in 2014 and deputy minority whip in 2013.
Assignments of the committee
2023-2024
Mullet was appointed to the subsequent committees:.
Color: #337ab7, }.
2021-2022
Mullet was appointed to the subsequent committees:.
Color: #337ab7, }.
2019-2020
Mullet was appointed to the subsequent committees:.
Color: #337ab7, }.
2017 session of the legislature
At the start of the 2017 legislative session, this lawmaker served on the subsequent committees:.
Washington committee assignments, 2017• Early Education & K-12 Education• Financial Institutions & Insurance• Healthcare.
2015 lawmaking period
At the start of the 2015 legislative session, Mullet was a member of the following committees:
Washington committee assignments, 2015• Early Education & K-12 Education• Financial Institutions & Insurance, Ranking member• Rules.
2013-2014
During the 2013-2014 legislative session, Mullet was a member of the following committees:
In 2013, the committee designations in Washington comprised of Early Learning & K-12 Education, Energy, Environment & Telecommunications, Financial Institutions & Insurance (with the Vice Chair role), and Transportation.
Legislation supported by sponsors
The table lists the bills sponsored by this legislator. The bills are sorted and organized by their history of action according to BillTrack50. To see all the bills sponsored by this legislator, click on the legislator’s name in the title of the table. The bills are sorted by their history of action, and the list may not be comprehensive. To see all the bills sponsored by this legislator, click on the legislator’s name in the title of the table. The bills are sorted by their history of action, and the list may not be comprehensive.
Elections
2024
Also check out: Washington gubernatorial race, 2024.
National election
After the primary, additional candidates for the general election will be included in this list. The general election is scheduled to take place on November 5, 2024. The primary is set to take place on August 6, 2024.
Unbiased primary election
Candidates who have withdrawn or been disqualified
Endorsements
The CSS code defines the styling properties for a web page layout, including the number of columns, the margins, and the width of certain elements.
Mullet received the subsequent recommendations. To submit us extra endorsements, click here.
2020
Also check out: Washington State Senate elections, 2020.
National election
Unbiased primary election
Candidates who have withdrawn or been disqualified
2016
Also check out: Washington State Senate elections, 2016.
The candidate filing deadline occurred on May 20, 2016. The general election took place on November 8, 2016, and the primary election was conducted on August 2, 2016. The elections for the Washington State Senate occurred in 2016.
In the general election for the Washington State Senate District 5, Mark Mullet, the current officeholder, emerged victorious over Chad Magendanz.
According to the Washington Secretary of State, the total number of votes in the 2016 General Election for the Washington State Senate in District 5 was 74,168. Chad Magendanz, the Republican candidate, received 49.65% of the votes, which amounted to 36,826. On the other hand, the Democratic candidate Mark Mullet, who was the incumbent, secured 50.35% of the votes, totaling 37,342.
The current Mark Mullet and Chad Magendanz faced no opposition in the top two primary for the Washington State Senate District 5.[2][3].
In the 2016 Washington State primary election for the top 5 district senate seat, Chad Magendanz, the incumbent from the Republican Party, ran against Mark Mullet, who was the Democratic candidate.
This candidate participated in one of Ballotpedia’s races to keep an eye on in 2016. Read more ».
Endorsements
In 2016, Mullet’s sponsorships included the following:[4].
2012
Also check out: Washington State Senate elections, 2012.
In the 2012 election for Washington State Senate, District 5, Mullet emerged victorious over Brad Toft (R) in the general election on November 6, 2012. Mullet faced no opposition in the blanket primary election on August 7 and secured the win. [5][6].
In the 2012 General Election for the State of Washington’s 5th District Senate, Brad Toft received a total of 67,548 votes, which accounted for 45.6% of the votes. Mark Mullet, representing the Democratic Party, secured 36,765 votes, constituting 54.4% of the total votes cast.
Themes for campaigns
2024
Responses to the Ballotpedia survey
Also check out: Ballotpedia’s Candidate Connection.
If you are looking to fill out Ballotpedia’s survey connection for the 2024 candidate, it has not been completed by Mark Mullet yet.
Who completes the Candidate Connection survey on Ballotpedia?
The survey about further education is conducted here. Since its launch in 2015, we have taken the Ballotpedia survey from more than 14,000 candidates. Completing the survey will update Ballotpedia’s candidate profile, allowing voters to know where candidates stand and who they are. This survey is for any candidate running for elected office.
Assist in enhancing Ballotpedia – transmit us information on candidate contact details.
2020
Mark Mullet did not finish Ballotpedia’s 2020 Candidate Connection questionnaire.
2012
The website of Mullet emphasized the following themes of the campaign:
Creating Jobs.
Advocating for Our Public Schools.
Guaranteeing Accessible Medical Services.
Promoting Clean Air and Water.
Contributors to the campaign
Font-size:1.2em;.
} .Cftable td {.
Text-align:center; }.
.Cfheader {.
Background-color: black !Essential; color:white !Essential;.
} .Cfheader.Representative {.
Background-color: #003388; color:white;.
} .Cfheader.Republican {.
Background-color: #db0000 !Important; color:white;.
(Note: The provided input is not a valid English sentence, so no changes were made to it.)
Background-color: #6db24f; color:white;.
} .Cf_bp_logo {width: 35px !Important;}.
The complete campaign finance data can be found on the website of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) here. It is important to note that the data on this page may only represent a portion of the funds spent on behalf of politicians or candidates, as the disclosures required by parties and candidates for state or federal elections may be incomplete. Additionally, it is possible that funds expended by satellite groups or spent on their behalf may not be related to the politician or candidate you are reading this disclaimer page for.
Mark Mullet has raised a total of $2,036,632 for his campaign in the Grand 5, District Senate in the state of Washington. In 2012, he raised $352,509, in 2016 he raised $561,915, and in 2020 he raised $1,122,208. This makes him the candidate with the highest contribution history for the office of District Senate in the state of Washington.
Source: Track the Finances.
2016
Mullet was re-elected to the Washington State Senate in 2016. Throughout that election period, Mullet collected a grand total of $561,915.
Follow the Money. The total amount of funds raised in 2016 was $561,915. Mark D Mullet received $11,180, while the House Democratic Campaign Committee Of Washington contributed $17,100. The 5th District Democrats donated $41,500, and the Washington State Democratic Party provided $56,352. Additionally, the Senate Democratic Campaign Committee Of Washington contributed $105,024. The main contributors to Mark Mullet’s campaign in 2016 were the campaign contributions from the Washington State Senate 2016 election.
2012
Mullet was elected to the Washington State Senate in 2012. Throughout that election period, Mullet raised a grand total of $352,509.
Source: Track the Cash. Total amount collected in 2012: $352,509. Washington Federation Of State Employees: $1,800. 5th District Democrats: $23,300. Washington State Democratic Party: $32,555. Mullet, Mark D: $57,996. Senate Democratic Campaign Committee Of Washington: $76,546. Main supporters of Mark Mullet’s campaign in 2012: Washington State Senate 2012 election – campaign donations.
Scorecards
Also, please refer to: State legislative rankings and State legislative rankings in Washington.
A state newspaper’s complete scorecard may assess the legislator’s voting record, whereas an advocacy group’s scorecard may evaluate the legislator’s voting record on a specific matter. Each report should be evaluated based on its individual qualities since scorecards have different objectives and approaches. The main goal of a scorecard is to educate voters about the legislator’s political stances, and it assesses the legislator’s voting record.
Irrespective of political beliefs or quantity, Ballotpedia aims to include all accessible scorecards. Scorecards created exclusively by specific organizations or with a restricted quantity are present in certain states. Ballotpedia is currently compiling a comprehensive catalog of published scorecards.
Please email your suggestions to Editor@ballotpedia.Org to contribute to the legislative scorecards overview of all 50 states. Click here to view the list of scorecards for Washington.
2022
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2022, click [display].
In 2022, the Washington State Legislature convened from January 10 to March 10.
Lawmakers are evaluated according to their voting on bills endorsed by the group.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to issues in the home construction sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to matters concerning the business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on gun regulations.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2021
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2021, click [show].
In 2021, the legislative body of Washington State, known as the Washington State Legislature, convened from January 11 to April 25.
Lawmakers are evaluated according to their voting on bills endorsed by the group.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to issues in the home construction sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on gun regulations.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2020
To view all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2020, click [show].
In 2020, the Washington State Legislature convened from January 13 to March 12.
Lawmakers are evaluated according to their voting on bills endorsed by the group.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes on bills concerning the state’s business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to issues in the home construction sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to matters concerning the business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on gun regulations.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2019
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2019, click [show].
In 2019, the legislative body of Washington State, known as the Washington State Legislature, convened from January 14 to April 28.
Lawmakers are evaluated according to their voting on bills endorsed by the group.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting records on bills concerning reproductive health matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on gun regulations.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2018
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2018, click [show].
In 2018, the second session of the Washington State Legislature took place from January 8 to March 8.
Lawmakers are evaluated according to their voting on bills endorsed by the group.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes on bills concerning the state’s business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to issues in the home construction sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on gun regulations.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2017
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2017, click [show].
The third special session took place from July 20 to June 21. The second special session took place from June 21 to May 23. The first special session took place from May 23 to April 24. The session of the Washington State Legislature, first session, in 2017 took place from April 23 to January 9.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes on bills concerning the state’s business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to issues in the home construction sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting records on bills concerning reproductive health matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on gun regulations.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2016
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2016, click [show].
During a special session held from March 11 to March 29, the legislature passed an additional budget. The second session of the 64th Washington State Legislature took place from January 11 to March 10 in 2016.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes on bills concerning the state’s business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their positions on matters related to small businesses.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on gun regulations.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2015
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2015, click [show].
From July 10 to June 28 and June 27 to May 29, and from May 28 to April 29, the legislature convened in a special session. The session took place from April 24 to January 12, marking the beginning of the 64th Washington State Legislature in 2015.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes on bills concerning the state’s business sector.
Lawmakers from the larger Spokane region are evaluated based on whether they supported or opposed funding for projects in the Spokane area.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2014
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2014, click [show].
In 2014, the second session of the 63rd Washington State Legislature was held from January 13 to March 14.[8].
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes on bills concerning the state’s business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes in favor of or against CCF’s stance.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their positions on matters related to small businesses.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on conservative matters.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
2013
To see all the scorecards we discovered for this lawmaker in 2013, click [show].
In 2013, the first session of the 63rd Washington State Legislature was in progress from January 14 to April 29.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes on bills concerning the state’s business sector.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their votes in favor of or against CCF’s stance.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their positions on matters related to small businesses.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on their voting record on legislation pertaining to ecological concerns.
Lawmakers are evaluated based on whether they voted in favor of or opposed WSLC’s stance.
Report on Unattended Votes
Also check out: Washington House of Representatives and Washington State Senate.
During the legislative session of 2014 in Washington state, the Report on Missed Votes released its annual detailed information on roll call votes missed by every state legislator. In total, there were 1,072 roll call votes, with Senator Mullet missing 19 of them. Three individual legislators missed more than 50 votes each. However, 90 legislators did not miss any votes. The legislature passed 237 bills, and a total of 1,372 bills were introduced in both the State Senate (with 396 votes) and the State House (with 515 votes). This information was made available on the legislative website in March 2014.